« September 2004 | Main | November 2004 »

October 31, 2004

happy halloween!

Last night we went to the first honest-to-goodness Halloween party we've attended in well over a decade and did not get home until about 2:30. Alcohol was consumed. Dance moves were executed. Cats hid under beds. Is it just me, or are the costumes available for purchase or rental much, much better than they used to be? I can remember, as a child, being disappointed that most of the available costumes were simply a crinkly polyester jumpsuit with a picture on the chest of who you were supposed to be. Even then, I knew that made no sense.

There were many inspired costumes last night, including...

  • Guinivere
  • Cookie Monster
  • Jackie Onassis Kennedy with a bloody skirt
  • Yasser Arafat
  • A wolf
  • A black lab
  • Beck
  • Various gothic princesses/sorceresses
  • A bloke in a kilt
  • A billionaire for Bush
  • A pirate
  • Fonzie-modo

I have pix, but I'm saving them for blackmail purposes.

I'll give you three hints as to my costume:

  • I did not have a hit in the '80s with "White Wedding."
  • I used to write really bad poetry.
  • My girlfriend is a high school student who likes to carry a wooden stake.

October 29, 2004

reading, writing, and race in kansas city

I'll be teaching English 225 again in the Spring, an Honors Program section with an Academic Service Learning component.

4963.png

I intend to focus the class on Kansas City history with special attention placed upon race and neighborhoods. Students will fulfill their ASL requirements by taking oral histories from current and former residents of the neighborhood(s) bounded by 49th Street, 63rd, the Paseo, and Oak Street. I don't yet have a full syllabus or a description, but I'll use my blog as a placeholder for relevant links as I work on the course design.

October 28, 2004

thursday

Out of order, chaos. Out of chaos, order. This is my life. It's your life, too.

The cat's gone blind. It happened quickly. He still gets around just fine. That's what whiskers and tails are for.

I seem to be going deaf in my right ear. It's happening quickly. I don't know if it's only temporary.

October 27, 2004

if this whole academic thing doesn't work out...

...I want to be Paul Westerberg.

Paul Westerberg with Telecaster thinline, sitting on small amp.

Meet me anyplace or anywhere or anytime
Now, I don't care, meet me tonight
If you will dare, I will dare

That is all. Carry on.

October 26, 2004

words i need to say

"You asked a really thoughtful and nuanced question, and I totally screwed up by making a stupid and inappropriate joke that was meant to be at my expense but wasn't, and I'm very sorry."

October 24, 2004

what happened to palimpsest?

Well, one person has asked, anyway. Palimpsest is the teaching blog I started in January of this year. The server upon which it resides was hacked and subsequently taken offline. Word is that it should be up by the end of this week.

In other words, you can all breathe easy again.

October 22, 2004

here's a weird new development

UMKC voice mail is now automatically emailed to the recipient in the form of a WAV file. I'm not thrilled with this, but they say it can't be changed. So...

...if you want to collaborate in some of the ephemeral toybox projects that Weez and I have been doing, call my office phone at 816-235-2559 and leave whatever sounds you like. Please wait until after 5 p.m. Central Time so my phone's not ringing off the hook while I'm in the office.

music to write by

Feeding the meme:

open for business

moralmcap.jpg

Mugs, baseball caps, t-shirts, and stickers.

October 21, 2004

me and my big mouth

So given that I seem to have pissed off some people on C18-L, now what do I do? I was not as polite as I could have been in pointing out the well-established ALL CAPS IS SHOUTING convention. However, the response to what I said is way out of proportion. I will wait before I respond at all. As the comments to my previous entry indicate, graduate students and younger scholars are put off by the kind of animosity often displayed on listservs. I know I was when I was a grad student.

I think I will apologize for the nature of my original post but clarify that the all caps convention applies to Internet communication (and has for a long time), not to all forms of writing. One of the C18-L correspondents seems to be confused about the convention, citing eighteenth-century poet Alexander Pope's use of all caps as a defense. I am also toying with the idea of joking like this: "To avoid confusion, all future ad hominem attacks upon me will please use the phrase 'ethical onanist.' This is what is printed on my business cards, and my chair says the department can't pay to have new cards printed up with the perversely brilliant phrase 'moral masturbator' on them."

I'm open to suggestions. Please advise.

October 20, 2004

apparently i'm a "right thinking moral masturbator"

Or at least that's what one subscriber to C18-L says.

Why, oh why, did I even try to point out basic rules of civil behavior? You would think scholars of the eighteenth century (a period known for its conduct books) would have a more sophisticated understanding of such matters.

"synecdoche" defined

Bear with me. I'll come back to this later. From the Oxford English Dictionary:

synecdoche
A figure by which a more comprehensive term is used for a less comprehensive or vice versâ; as whole for part or part for whole, genus for species or species for genus, etc. Formerly sometimes used loosely or vaguely, and not infrequently misexplained.

The definition from Wikipedia is pretty good:

Synecdoche is a kind of metonymy in which:

  • A part of something is used for the whole,
  • The whole is used for a part,
  • The species is used for the genus,
  • The genus is used for the species, or
  • The stuff of which something is made is used for the thing.

Some common examples of synecdoche:

  • A part of something is used for the whole
    • "hands" to refer to workers, "head" to refer to cattle, "threads" to refer to clothing, "wheels" for "car", "mouths to feed" to refer to hungry people
  • The whole is used for a part
    • "the police" for a handful of officers, the "smiling year" for "spring", "the Pentagon" for the top generals in the Pentagon building
  • The species is used for the genus
    • "cutthroat" for "assassin", "kleenex" for "facial tissue", "castle" is used for "home",
  • The genus is used for the species
    • "creature" for "man", "personal computer" for "IBM-compatible personal computer", "colored" for a particular color
  • The stuff of which something is made is used for the thing
    • "hickory" for "baseball bat", "copper" for "penny", "boards" for "stage", "ivories" for "piano keys", "plastic" for "credit card"
Synecdoche, as well as other forms of metonymy, is one of the most common ways to characterize a fictional character. Frequently, someone will be consistently described by a single body part or feature, such as the eyes, which comes to represent their person.

Also, sonnets and other forms of (erotic) love poetry frequently use synecdoches to characterize the beloved in terms of individual body parts rather than a whole, coherent self. This practice is especially common in the Petrarchan sonnet, where the idealised beloved is often described part by part, from head to toe.

As I said, I'll probably be coming back to this concept.

October 19, 2004

eighteenth-century letter days

I have been searching my notes in vain for reference to a practice I remember reading about.

I can remember learning that in the eighteenth century Anglo-American world, members of a religious community would gather to listen to letters from abroad (concerning spiritual matters) being read out loud.

Am I imagining this, or is this a well-known practice that somehow slipped below the radar of my note-taking habits?

Cross posted at C18-L

"all caps is like shouting"

Are there still people who do not know that using all capital letters in their electronic correspondence is equivalent to shouting?

Yes, there are.

Do these people quote from a definition of all caps as shouting as support for their position that all caps is not shouting?

Again I say unto thee, yes.

mla bloggers

I'll be heading back east to visit family and friends in December. And yes, I'll be in Philadelphia for the annual meeting of the Modern Language Association at the same time as many of the folks who read this blog. I'd be happy to meet as many of you as want to get together at this annual shin-dig. Last year, I met up with Chuck and Kathleen in the hotel bar (and I met Steven Shaviro briefly).

This year there seem to be many more likely-to-attend-MLA bloggers who are aware of each other. With that in mind, I've taken the liberty of creating MLA Bloggers. If you'd like to contribute, send me an email.

Also, let's all write to the organizers of the MLA to ask them to put the entire conference program online, so that misrepresentations of the work we do will not be quite so easy to get away with. What the heck, let's all write MLA President Robert Scholes.

Bonus Links: " The Academic Job Interview Revisited," by Mary Dillon Johnson (via Prof Grrrrl).

October 18, 2004

spirit, desire: we will fall

Tonight, I spent two hours grading at the Broadway Cafe, and then headed to the Uptown Theater at around 9:00. In college, I would drink booze before a show; now I drink espresso. Go figure.

As I walked up to the entrance, the ticket taker said, "You know PJ Harvey's not playing." Not even a question, just a statement. "Well, I do now," I replied. He looked irritated with me.

I arrived just in time to catch the last three or four songs by the Dresden Dolls, including a wicked cover of Black Sabbath's "War Pigs." Just piano and drums, but they tore that song up. Say what you will about poor, doddery, old Ozzy Osbourne, but that's one powerful song.

After about a 30-minute break, Sonic Youth came out. Something struck me as not quite right about this show, compared to the one back in August. Maybe the sound just wasn't right, which is really the resposibility of the venue more than the musicians. I've only seem them live twice now, and they sounded so crisp and clear at the Blue Note. Tonight they sounded kind of muddy. On the other hand, they did cut loose with more abandon a few times tonight. At times the songs just absolutely fell apart and careened into long stretches of feedback, which was great. I headed up to the balcony for the last 20 minutes of the show, and they sounded much better from that vantage point.

Amusing stage banter:

Kim Gordon: "It's great to be here in Kansas, again."
Crowd: "MISSOURI!"
[awkward pause]
Thurston Moore: "We're in Missouri, babe."

I know that the proprietors of Gimpysoft and Badda Blog! were there, but I did not see them. The venue was a lot bigger than I thought it was going to be.

Geez, now I've got to try to go to sleep. Tomorrow I hope to focus on getting some writing done.

October 17, 2004

read this: race and education in kansas city

I met Joe Miller at the last KC Bloggers Meetup.. He used to write for The Pitch, Kansas City's alternative news weekly, but now he's working on his first book, "about the Kansas City Central High School debate team." His blog, Kansas City Soil, is one of the best around in part because of entries like this one.

placeholder for local artist

I've got to start seeking out the places where KC's creative people present their work. A friend sends along a link to Andrea Flamini:

Andrea creates generative video installations. At the core of his research is the development of random and generative methods of sequencing video and sounds, a process often called 'Computational Cinema' or 'Process Cinema.' His generative videos are designed to play endlessly, in an unlimited number of random variations.

sunday: the busy day for academics

I know I should jump in here, and I probably will at some point after I get a bunch of stuff done:

  • Grading.
  • Writing.
  • Emailing.
  • Some class prep.
  • Groceries.
  • Vacuuming.

Tonight, I reward myself for a busy day of work with a show featuring:

October 15, 2004

mos def

This makes me very happy: "Not Just an Act: Mos Def's Return To Rap Is Genuine", by Joe Warminsky (WaPo)

October 14, 2004

more on derrida

I am generally disappointed with what's been written on the occasion of philosopher Jacques Derrida's death because so much of appears to be just plain wrong or poorly informed. I'm not just talking about people who refer to his writing as "drivel" or "nonsense." Those people are either stupid or intellectually lazy, and I've never been very interested in interacting with people who display those qualities. My mama didn't raise me that way.

I would never take a strong, public stand for or against some intellectual movement about which I am not very knowledgeable. If I don't understand something, my strategy is to defer extensive or ostensibly definitive commentary. This is what scholars are supposed to do. If you are irritated with Derrida because you read an essay or two in grad school that rubbed you the wrong way, or because someone told you what he stands for and you don't like the sound of it, then you are not qualified to pass judgment upon his work or its influence. I am as impatient as the next person with Derrida's often-opaque writing style, but comprehension is as much a function of the abilities of the reader as of the clarity of the writer.

If a student were to ask me to define deconstruction, the movement that Derrida is credited with founding, I would say something like this, "All seemingly coherent and self-contained systems actually contain within themselves the seeds of their own undoing. Something that seems to be one thing could actually be said to be its exact opposite." However, I would also acknowledge that this two-sentence description is probably violently reductive, and smart people have written reams on the subject. I would then help that student find some of that writing.

Here's something I did like, something that provides as accurate (to me) a summation of Derrida's intellectual project as we might ask for. Scott McLemee links to a 2003 piece by Terry Eagleton, who writes:

[Derrida] did indeed comment that "there is nothing outside the text", but he did not mean by this that Mme Derrida or the Arc de Triomphe were just thinly disguised pieces of writing. He meant that there is nothing in the world that is not "textual", in the sense of being made up of a complex weave of elements which prevents it from being cleanly demarcated from something else. "Textual" means that nothing stands gloriously alone. He has never argued that anything can mean anything, rather that meaning is never final or stable. No system of meaning can ever be unshakeably founded. "Decentring" human beings does not mean abolishing them, but denying that they can ever be independent of the forces that went into their making. To deconstruct does not mean to destroy, but to show that terms which seem to be opposites (say, "man" and "woman") violently suppress the ways in which they are secretly in collusion. Or, more generally, to show how every coherent system is forced at certain key points to violate its own logic. It is, Derrida has insisted, a form of political critique, not just a literary method. Indeed, he has recently described deconstruction as a kind of radicalised Marxism - a claim which is hardly likely to endear him to the killjoys of King's Parade, but which is scarcely consistent with claiming that he believes in nothing but writing.

October 13, 2004

backdoor draft

"Is there any relief that can be offered to these people and their families?"

Kerry: "This is a reflection of the bad judgment this president has exercised...Our military is overextended...I've proposed adding two active duty divisions" And special forces to take the pressure off the National Guard and the Reserve. Returns to a common theme: "America is strongest when we are working with real alliances." Emphasizes the cost of the war and finishes with a reference to Bush "taking his eye off Osama Bin Laden."

Bush: The best way to provide relief for our troops is to succeed in Iraq. Poeple I've talked to, their spirits were high. They didn't feel their service was a back door draft: they felt it was an opportunity to serve their country. Turns to his recurrent point about American independence: we should not have to ask permission of other countries. Argues that this is Kerry's position.

Really? No soldier told you that they thought you were doing a bad job? I wonder why.

October 11, 2004

new blog on remixing culture

Media Trips: "A guide to artists and producers who sample (remix) popculture." (via Lawrence Lessig)

country song for jacques derrida

If I had a microphone for vocals, I might try my hand at recording a tongue-in-cheek song I wrote with Mike (and others?) in grad school. You'll just have to make do with the lyrics:

Deconstruction

Deconstruction,
When will you be satisfied?
Deconstruction,
You're never satisfied.
You never listen to a word I say.
You only want to deconstruct me.
But I'm not a text.

Deconstruction,
Your means have no ends.
Deconstruction,
You got more enemies than friends.
You never listen to a word I say.
You only want to deconstruct me.
But I'm not a text.

Gonna find me another theory.
One not used by every other slob.
Mostly I need somethin' that will
Get me a job (preferably tenure track)

[Repeat first verse]

We also wrote a song about Lacan called ahem "Just Like the Penis My Mom Never Had," but now's not the time for that little ditty.

waves of noise

20041008c.mp3 (3M)

October 10, 2004

gopnik on greenblatt on shakespeare

"Will Power: Why Shakespeare Remains the Necessary Poet," by Adam Gopnik in the New Yorker.

take a peek at my exams

Both of my classes had exams last week. Here what they looked like:

English 433/533: Histories of Writing, Reading, and Publishing - Fall 2004
Take-home midterm examination: due on Tuesday, October 12

You may choose to answer only this question. Length should be 1,500 to 2,000 words.

1. Scholars suggest several approaches to studying the history of writing, reading, and publishing. First, assess three methodologies suggested by our texts: What are the similarities? Differences? Advantages? Disadvantages? What might a particular methodology cause us to lose sight of? Should or could one approach be developed to serve all possible inquiries?

Second, apply one of the methodologies to one of our primary texts: what questions would that particular methodology lead to you ask? How would the results of your inquiry be different if you were using a different methodology?

Or you may answer two of these. Each answer should be 750 to 1,000 words.

2. Several of our readings, both primary and secondary, have sought to define what an author is. How do these definitions differ? How is such a definition important? What is gained or lost by establishing such a definition? Discuss at least three readings and be sure to select from both the primary and the secondary texts.

3. Walter Ong and David Olson discuss the effects of writing upon individual cognition and upon culture. How does what they have to say compare to Pope’s vision in The Dunciad?

4. Swift, Pope, and Birkerts lament (or lampoon) the passing from one media age into another. Compare what each of these writers has to say about the changes he perceives taking place in his culture. Are they all singing the same tune, or do they have a different understanding of the changes taking place?

Use a word processor, double space, and staple.


English 225 – Fall 2004 Test: Rhetorical Analysis
Explain your answers to these questions as fully as possible. No 1- or 2-word answers get full credit.
Always think about audience. 20 questions. 5 points each for a maximum possible score of 100%.

Henry Louis Gates, “Changing Places
1. If all the audience has is the content of essay, what ethos does Gates have? How does his ethos change if the audience knows he is Chair of the Department of African and African American Studies, and Director of the W. E. B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research at Harvard University.
2. What exigence does this essay have?
What rhetorical appeals are at work in the following passages?
3. “Like many black people who came of age in the 60's, I've always delighted in the mind-bending playfulness of the black vernacular”
4. “And jokes turning on malaprops and double-entendres are among the most vital aspects of black culture.”
5. “Professor Labov argues that black Americans have become more monolingual since the 60's - that fewer of them have a mastery of standard English. That's the result of residential segregation, the fact that poor blacks tend to live with poor blacks”
6. The paragraph in which Gates quotes African-American novelist James Baldwin.

Atlanta Journal-Constitution, “Textbook rewrites slavery’s reality
What rhetorical appeals are at work in the following passages?
7. “Childhood innocence doesn’t mean childhood ignorance.”
8. The use of quotations from John Snarey
9. “ ‘They understand that it would be unfair if they were made to mow the neighbor's lawn and didn't get paid for it’ ”

Steven E. Landsburg, “Don’t Vote: It makes more sense to play the lottery
10. What ethos does Landsburg have?
11. How does Landsburg make use of pathos?
12. What do you make of Landsburg using the word “you” so much?
13. How effective is Landsburg’s use of logos?
14. What exigence does this essay have?

Timothy Noah, “The National Museum of Ben Nighthorse Campbell: The Smithsonian’s new travesty
15. What ethos does Noah have?
16. What exigence does this essay have?
17. What tactics of definition does Noah use?
What rhetorical appeals are at work in the following passages?
18. The first sentence of the essay.
19. The third paragraph.
20. “I have to believe that those responsible for the museum's botched debut have felt the sting of public opprobrium and will make changes that encourage the public to take it more seriously.”

For 5 possible extra credit points, answer one of the following questions. Explain your answer fully
1. Which essay makes the most effective use of rhetoric?
2. Which essay makes the most effective use of tactics of definition?
3. Which essay makes the most effect use of epideictic rhetoric?

October 9, 2004

jacques derrida (1930-2004)

Sitting here at Coffee Girls, which has on-again-off-again wifi, I learn from Kathleen that Jacques Derrida has died. She links to a number of obits.

I can't say that my work is heavily influenced by Derrida, or by deconstruction, but I've always liked his essay, "...That Dangerous Supplement...."

Update: See also...

October 8, 2004

seminar description: orality & literacy in the 18th-c

Here's the graduate seminar I'll be teaching next semester:

Literary scholar Nicholas Hudson has recently repeated media theorist Marshall McLuhan's assertion that "European intellectuals achieved a clear perception of 'orality' only after their own world had been engulfed in print." In the middle of the eighteenth century, British actor and elocutionist Thomas Sheridan wrote with amazed respect about "the power which words acquire, even the words of fools and madmen, when forcibly uttered by the living voice." For Sheridan, as for many of his contemporaries, the speech of preachers, politicians, actors, barristers, and even everyday people was a threatening and unruly force compared to the presumably ordered presentation of information through writing and print. The spoken word had been an essential part of human communication for thousands of years, yet the advent of the printed word and widespread literacy in eighteenth-century Britain dramatically reoriented attitudes towards speech. Students in this course will consider just how "clear" the perception of orality might have been among literate people in this period as they study developments in oral and literate practice in eighteenth-century Britain. We will learn what scholars have had to say about orality and literacy, and we will read the works of eighteenth-century poets, dramatists, rhetoricians, clergymen, and cultural commentators.
Course requirements will include class presentations, a take-home exam, an annotated bibliography, and a final research paper building upon the research completed for the annotated bibliography. This course will be rewarding to students interested in the eighteenth century, literary history, rhetoric, media studies, cultural studies, and critical literacy studies.

October 7, 2004

i read the news today, oh boy

I've been busy, dear reader, trying to meet deadlines. Hitting some of them, missing others. For example, I recently submitted an application for summer research money from a federal source; if I get it, I'll let you know, but if you don't hear anything, well... More applications will be submitted in the coming months. You can't hit the ball if you don't take a swing. And I'm going to swing a lot this year. I'm very caffeinated lately, which usually results in panic attacks but which is working fine this semester, so keep those Americano's comin'!

It's raining in Kansas City today, which I like. I used to be more of a sunshine guy, but it was very dry for a long time when we first moved here in 2002, and I missed living in Maryland where we were a 25-minute drive away from the Chesapeake Bay. So when it finally started raining, it felt really good. Now I welcome the rainy days.

Can anyone loan me $50,000? Scott suggested a tuning, and I've been trying it out. If Chris had posted about three hours earlier, I'd be on a different tack right now. As a musician, I have a tendency to stay in my comfort zone, and I'd like to set up guidelines that push myself outside of that zone. DADGGD tuning is pretty cool, and I've been doodling around with different sounds in that tuning.

I've been daydreaming about buying an small, vintage tube amp. Compared to the modern, solid-state stuff, the tube amps are supposed to sound warmer and have more character. Hunting around on eBay, I've seen a number of tempting little guys, amps from as long ago as 50 years for under $300. I'm not seriously in the market, yet, but maybe in the next year or so.

There's a nice profile of musicians Gillian Welch and David Rawlings in the New Yorker. Their music is hypnotic and haunting. In a different region of the alt.country nation, Son Volt is getting back in the studio to record another album, which is welcome news. But the only original member of the band participating is Jay Farrar, and boy, are people on the message boards mad! Starting October 12, you can watch via webcam as the recording sessions take place.

And this brings me to yet another alt.country observation. Last night I was listening to Van Lear Rose, the recent Loretta Lynn album, produced by Jack White of the White Stripes. It's a pretty good album, but not great. Compared to your average Son Volt album, the arrangements are just not very interesting. Jay Farrar (or maybe the now-non-Son-Volt Boquist brothers) should be working with Loretta Lynn, not Jack White. But ever since Uncle Tupelo broke up (resulting in the creation of two new bands), Farrar's career has been pretty haphazard, unfortunately. Son Volt just flamed out after three albums, while Wilco has experienced a slow burn to their current prominent place of respectable sales and critical acclaim. Ah, the uncertainties of an artistic career.

Finally, what kind of country do we live in where someone can be in prison, serving a "sentence for having sex while HIV positive"? I've said it before, and I'll say it again: America has jumped the shark.

"I can't stop thinking that it doesn't have to be this way," Jay Farrar

October 5, 2004

my so-called musical life

Thanks to everyone for your input on the past two entries. My career as an amateur musician has memorable peaks:

  • Age 10: Playing banjo, solo, in front of the entire school at a talent show in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
  • Age 20: Playing guitar in a band in front of a crowd of drunken sailors from the sixth fleet inside an inactive volcano in Naples, Italy.
  • Age 23: Playing bass in a band in a small club in Nashville, Tennessee.

And now: ephemeraltoybox, which is another kettle of fish altogether.

October 4, 2004

helloooo...

...pick a tuning, please.

And head over to Weez's and offer your thoughts on her questions.

Let's get this show on the road.

Don't make me talk about eighteenth-century Methodist sermons...because you know as well as I do that I'm not afraid to do it...

October 3, 2004

a call for participation

Weez and I are collaborating on another audio project, and we need your input, dear reader:

  1. How long should the track be? Choose any value between 120 and 300 seconds.
  2. How should the guitar be tuned? Choose one of the following:
    • E G D G E D
    • G G C G C D
    • C G D G B B
  3. How many guitar tracks should there be? Choose any value betwen 1 and 4.

Pick one question and answer it. First come, first served.

After we have answers to these questions, I will record guitar parts in small enough chunks that they can be looped and arranged in a variety of ways. Weez will record voice tracks in a similar fashion. Then we will share GarageBand files of what we've recorded and, independently, come up with two final mixes, arranging the guitar and vocal (and possibly percussion) parts as we see fit. Two sound files. Many collaborators. Game on.

Update: Weez has posted questions, too.

October 1, 2004

"mesmer" for your friday

Here's a mellow track (mp3, 3.7M) to help get you through your Friday morning.